![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Active Entries
- 1: Hold Your Nose and Vote by Tuesday, November 5, 2024
- 2: Hold Your Nose and Vote by Tuesday, March 5, 2024
- 3: Hold Your Nose and Vote by Tuesday, November 8, 2022
- 4: Hold Your Nose and Vote by June 7, 2022
- 5: If You Like Your Health, Vote No in California’s Recall Election
- 6: Escaped gaming meme: Orange Team Utopia
- 7: Hold Your Nose and Vote by Tuesday, March 3, 2020
- 8: Hold Your Nose and Vote on Tuesday, November 6, 2018
- 9: What to do about climate change? Vote!
- 10: Remembering Yeti
Style Credit
- Style: Midnight for Heads Up by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2009-08-01 04:20 pm (UTC)What would be good on that one would be an absolute cap on bonding authority. Also, if the private groups behind every bond measure were forced to pay for the cost of the election in the event a bond measure failed (which would be a BIG dissuasive). And corporate shields do not apply - it's all private individuals.
Right now, there's no downside to trying to spend future $. I think we both agree there needs to be one. Just what form.